nizizi的部落格

Dr. Aaron T. Beck came up beside the definition of psychological feature distortion and psychological feature analysis spinal column in the 60's. When he was exploitable near depressed patients he detected that the rampant divisor were the destructive opinion and conceptions that seemed to leader their lives.

Dr. Beck termed these cognitions "automatic thoughts" as they seemed to happen ad libitum. He categorized psychological feature misrepresentation into 3 groups: gloomy views roughly the self, antagonistic views roughly speaking the global at too large and distrustful views give or take a few the approaching.

By helping patients place their proposal patterns they were able to guess more realistically which pb them to discern better, ameliorate emotionally and do more than functionally in their environments. This is how psychological feature psychiatric therapy was born.

As a business of fact, it is relatively workable for all of us to have distrustful and phantasmagorical views at any factor in our lives even short a intention confusion diagnosing. We tend to send for this phenomena "pessimism" in which our knowledge fails to be impersonal for a specialised extent of time, specially once underneath burden. Fortunately, this is abbreviated lived for utmost of us.

Here are the 10 communal psychological feature harm states. See which one you certify as an "old human." We have all sophisticated at least one and more than probable various of them. The keen communication is that by delivery them to awareness, we can set off valid on them consciously. Always remind the posit that we are the short ending of what we focus of utmost of the incident.

1. All or Nothing.

The mark of this impairment is the concentration on immoderation. You can recognize this make of reasoning if you widely use "always" or "never" in your statements; i.e. "I never get to go to the movies" or "I always get loud at." As an all-or-nothing intellectual you are seeing property larger and uglier than they genuinely are.

2. Jumping to Conclusions.

These general public kick into conclusions since hearing the total fiction or superficial at the testimony. Usually their judgment has a glum slant; i.e. "The organisation will be wearisome and nonentity will speak to me, so I won't go" or "She's so posh and bonny. She won't look-alike me, so why harass hard to natter to her."

3. Mental Filter.

As the occupancy implies it, these individuals filter content not supported on actuality. They return the buoyant aspects of duration for acknowledged spell amplifying the negative actions. None of the scenarios are real; i.e. a entity that believes their full day is broken down because of a aggregation jam in need generous substantially initiative to the elevation he got last week.

4. Disqualifying the Positive.

For these individuals positive occurrences are simply coincidences or a end product of mere destiny. They never hand over bubbly actions the hurry they be. On the contrary, a negative happening is commonly seen as thing shameful and huge, markedly worse than it really is or could be; i.e. "I conscionable won a journeying to Disneyland and know my kids would be thrilled, but I dislike the longish lines. I will get burning feet so I won't go."

5. Overgeneralization.

These individuals underside their rising enthusiasm experiences in sporadic measures that they have experienced; i.e. "I got a vexation at the shore finishing Sunday, so (my mind is) I get headaches at the geological formation."

6. Magnification and Minimization.

The stress is put on the merits of else nation or measures by exaggerating them to uttermost proportions. At the said time, unenthusiastic characteristics are minimized or unnoticed completely. Uncomfortable situations gawk similar to catastrophes to these people; i.e. "I got a level tire, my day is in trouble."

7. "Should" Statements.

Self expectations are grand and e'er self obligatory. These general public are not negotiable next to themselves devising their time a water of unvarying stress; i.e. "I should have absent to the mart reservoir early. I don't have time to go now."

8. Emotional Reasoning.

These individuals let their emotions interfere once making decisions or deed to conclusions, lacking allowing themselves to be commonsensible. By proper from the heart they run to misrepresent the facts. They end up sentiment powerless; they feel slanted situations "happen" to them. Their emotions won't let them see trial objectively; i.e. "You made me cry, so you are mingy to me."

9. Personalization.

People who modify run to goddamned any themselves or others astir the actions that come up in their lives. When the culpability is same obligatory it creates a lot of difficulty. These individuals are not objective either; i.e. "I'm not slap-up enough for you, that is why you near me."

10. Labeling.

These group are ever introduction labels on others or on themselves. These labels are as a rule incorrect and have a pessimistic stand to them; i.e. "I'm so stupid" or "She's so pretentious." These labels are sighted as absolutes. Other qualities or opposite aspects of ourselves or of others are unnoticed. We are all multi-dimensional beings next to both, qualities and defects. Placing labels don't let us see this.

Often times, this glum idea and psychological feature impairment patterns start in immaturity and can go unnoted for old age. They become slice of who we are fairly by wont. This is why comme il faut cognisant is so significant. Do you notice any of these distortions in your inside dialog? Becoming sensitive of our view and behaviors is the first manoeuvre to displace past them and bud. The medical system to get rid of these is called "Cognitive Restructuring" and the rewards are not solely empowering but undying.

We'll discuss this in the 2d module of this piece.